top of page

From Promising Juniors to Stagnating Seniors – Why Has Development Stalled in Swedish tennis?

Writer: Martin Stern TaipaleMartin Stern Taipale

Is the Physical level Swedish Tennis' Biggest Weakness?

A continuation of the insights from "Can 600 Elite Players Be Wrong?" – read more here.

One of the biggest challenges in Swedish tennis development is a reality that many might not fully accept: tennis is an intensely physical sport, and physical conditioning is absolutely crucial.

Imagine a tournament draw with 128 players. In each round, half of the competitors advance. While skill and strategy determine many matches, as the tournament progresses, competition gets tougher. In the final rounds, where players are equally skilled in hitting and moving, it’s often physical and mental attributes that make the difference.

Of course, improving tennis skills is essential, but players must also physically prepare for the demands of the sport—because building true athletic capacity takes time.


Is Sweden Lagging in Physical Tennis Training?

In Sweden, discussions about physical training often remain superficial. We talk about strength, endurance, and speed, but "physical conditioning" is so much more than that. These attributes are merely tools to solve movement challenges on the court. Every technical adjustment a coach makes is limited by a player's physical toolbox—how they move, position themselves, and execute strokes isn’t just about strength; it’s about a holistic performance framework.


What Does the Data Say?

At AIM-X, we have collected data on Swedish players aged 12–18 for years. Our ADV-X Tennis Fitness Rating shows a strong correlation between physical capacity and tennis ranking. With R² values of 0.816 for boys and 0.819 for girls, the data confirms: the better prepared you are in the movement patterns essential for tennis—serve, groundstrokes, and court movement—the higher the likelihood of ranking improvement.

Across all age groups, physical ability and ranking follow the same trend throughout life. This underscores a crucial insight: the most effective way to improve performance is to enhance physical capacity.


From 6-70 year old teennis players and their relation between UTR and Fitness scores from our ADV-X Tennis Fitness Rating
From 6-70 year old teennis players and their relation between UTR and Fitness scores from our ADV-X Tennis Fitness Rating


Why Do Swedish Players Plateau?

The data reveals that Swedish juniors excel at MOVE—speed, directional changes, and endurance. Among these, endurance is the strongest attribute, likely because it is the easiest to train. However, MOVE has the weakest correlation to higher ranking. While movement is important, the ability to generate power with your hands is what truly defines top players.

What Swedish juniors struggle to develop is WINNER—groundstroke power (rotational force)—which, unfortunately, has the strongest correlation with high ranking.


What Are Federations Testing Today?

Traditional fitness tests used in national programs show a correlation of just 0.5–0.6 with ranking, compared to ADV-X’s 0.90 correlation. This means that these standard tests cannot reliably predict whether a player’s physical fitness supports their tennis performance. The issue? These tests are not tennis-specific—often measuring attributes used across multiple sports. While it’s interesting to compare athletes, a tennis player doesn’t benefit from knowing how well they perform in the same drills as a hockey player or golfer.


What Physical Scores Are Needed for Different Levels?

At AIM-X, we measure a player's current physical status and set clear targets for what is needed to reach different ranking levels:

  • 75 points (Top 1000 ATP/WTA): Requires structured training from around age 16.

  • 90 points (Top 100 ATP/WTA): Requires an exceptional physical foundation combined with focused training.




The Limits of General Fitness vs. Tennis-Specific Training

General fitness takes you only part of the way to the top. While it builds a solid base, tennis-specific training is what separates elite players. Becoming truly explosive, developing rotational power, and optimizing speed require a specialized plan.

Growth and natural development will improve basic physical attributes, but learning to move efficiently in a tennis-specific way demands more knowledge and a structured approach.



Physical Scores and Long-Term Development

Our analysis of Swedish players (ages 12–18) shows the following average scores:


Girls:

  • 12–13 years: 42 points

  • 14–15 years: 55 points

  • 16–18 years: 61 points


Boys:

  • 12–13 years: 44 points

  • 14–15 years: 56 points

  • 16–18 years: 64 points


Top 10 players in each age group significantly outperform their peers:

  • Girls 16–18: Top 10 average 74 points

  • Boys 16–18: Top 10 average 70 points

The data is clear: physical ability and ranking go hand in hand.


Which Movement Patterns Are Most Important?

From our statistics, a clear ranking emerges in terms of what matters most for success in tennis:

  1. WINNER (Groundstroke Power) – The ability to hit with speed and precision is the #1 factor for success.

  2. ACE (Serve Power) – A fast, explosive serve allows players to shorten points and gain immediate advantages.

  3. MOVE (Court Speed) – While crucial, its impact is lesser than the other two—especially in later stages of competition, where all players can move well.


Conclusion: Why Aren’t We Producing Top Players?

From ages 12 to 18, physical development in Swedish players stagnates. This plateau makes it highly unlikely that players will ever reach the physical levels needed for international competition.

  • Top 100 ATP/WTA (90 points): With the current development rate, Swedish players will never reach this level.

  • Top 1000 ATP/WTA (75 points): Even reaching this requires a major shift in training methodology.

Players in Sweden progress physically until age 16, but the current training model fails beyond this age. That’s when specific physical training must take over, yet this step isn’t happening.


The solution? Coaches across the country need better education on how to systematically prepare players at every stage—before and after age 16. With the right knowledge and methods, we can reverse the trend and ensure players continue to develop.


At AIM-X, we have the expertise and data-driven methods to help—but it must be a long-term, structured approach, not just isolated interventions.

Right now, Swedish tennis feels like it’s sticking a finger in the air to see which way the wind is blowing—hoping for the best without real direction. We know that doesn’t work.


Are you ready to test your physical capacity in relation to your ranking?

Book your ADV-X Tennis Fitness Rating test today!

 
 

Comments


bottom of page